Royal Air Maroc (RAM), Morocco's national airline, has recently voiced strong criticism against the European Union's Open Skies agreement, labeling it as unfair and detrimental to its operations. This sentiment was expressed by RAM's CEO, Abdelhamid Addou, during a conference on competition held in Marrakesh. The airline's grievances highlight the broader challenges faced by carriers from the Global South in competing with their European counterparts under current aviation policies.
By Aditya M
The Core of the Dispute
The Open Skies agreement, provisionally applied since December 2006 and officially in force since March 2018, was designed to liberalize air transport between the EU and Morocco. It allows for unlimited traffic rights between the two regions, aiming to boost tourism and economic ties. However, RAM argues that the agreement disproportionately benefits European airlines, particularly low-cost carriers like Ryanair, which have significantly increased their market share at the expense of Moroccan carriers.
Addou pointed out that while European airlines enjoy extensive access to the Moroccan market, RAM faces numerous hurdles when attempting to expand its operations in Europe. These obstacles include stringent regulatory requirements, limited airport slots, and other operational challenges that are not equally imposed on European airlines flying to Morocco.
A Call for Revision
Addou's remarks underscore a growing frustration within RAM regarding what it perceives as a lack of genuine competition. He emphasized the need for a revised approach to the Open Skies agreement that would ensure a level playing field. "We talk about Open Skies and Closed Airports," Addou remarked, highlighting the inconsistency in how the agreement is applied.
The CEO also noted that the current framework allows European carriers to dominate the African market, while African airlines continue to face significant restrictions. This imbalance, according to Addou, undermines the principles of fair competition and hampers the growth of African aviation.
The Broader Implications
RAM's criticism of the Open Skies agreement is not an isolated incident. Similar concerns have been raised by other African carriers, including those in Tunisia and Egypt, which have also called for renegotiations of their aviation agreements with the EU. The issue reflects a broader tension between developed and developing regions in the global aviation industry.
For Morocco, the stakes are particularly high. The country has positioned itself as a key hub for connecting Africa with Europe and the Americas. The success of this strategy relies heavily on the ability of its national carrier to compete effectively on international routes. As Morocco prepares to co-host the 2030 FIFA World Cup, the need for a robust and competitive aviation sector becomes even more critical.
Moving Forward
In response to these challenges, RAM is advocating for a more balanced and equitable approach to aviation policy. This includes not only revising the Open Skies agreement but also addressing broader issues such as airport infrastructure and regulatory harmonization. By doing so, RAM hopes to create an environment where competition is fair and all airlines, regardless of their origin, have an equal opportunity to thrive.
The debate over the Open Skies agreement is likely to continue as stakeholders from both sides seek to find common ground. For now, RAM's call for a fairer and more competitive aviation landscape serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges inherent in global air transport.
Conclusion
Royal Air Maroc's criticism of the EU's Open Skies agreement highlights a significant issue in international aviation policy. The call for fair competition and a level playing field is not just about one airline's struggle but about the broader dynamics of global air transport. As the industry continues to evolve, addressing these concerns will be crucial for ensuring that all carriers can compete on equal terms, ultimately benefiting consumers and the global economy.
Add comment
Comments